Our Code of Ethics
Our sustainability strategy is based on our Code of Ethics

Our sustainability history
Learn about our path towards sustainability

Global Partnerships
Working together for a sustainable tomorrow… Today

Untitled Document






We are advised by a panel of six independent sustainability experts. Their role is to provide us with feedback on our reporting and to challenge us to improve our performance. The experts have agreed to remain on the panel for a minimum of two years and to provide their personal advice for free.

Panel members


Magali Delmas
Associate Professor of Management, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

  • PhD in Business Policy and Strategy, HEC Graduate School of Management, Paris
  • Associate Professor, Institute of the Environment and Anderson School of Management, UCLA
  • UCLA Luskin Scholar
  • Associate Professor of Management, University of California, Santa Barbara (1998-2008)
  • Economic Advisor to the Director General of Directorate General III Industry at the European Commission, Brussels (1996-1998)

David Hertz FAIA, LEED.AP
Founder and president of Studio of Environmental Architecture (S.E.A)

  • BSc in Architecture from the Southern California Institute of Architecture (ARC).
  • Founder and President of Syndesis Inc. most noted for its development of Syndecrete®, an innovative pre-cast lightweight concrete architectural surfacing material which incorporates recycled aggregates.
  • Member of the environmental committees of the L.A. Chapter of the American Institute of Architects and the Construction Specifications Institute, as well as of the Environmental Council of Concrete Organizations.

Claude Mandil
Former Executive Director, International Energy Agency

  • PhD in Engineering from the Ecole Polytechnique and Ecole des Mines, Paris
  • Executive Director International Energy Agency (2003- 07)
  • Chairman and CEO of Institut Français du Pétrole (2000-03)
  • Managing Director of Gaz de France (1998-2000)
  • Director General for Energy and Raw Materials at the French Ministry of Industry, Post, and Telecommunications (1990-1998)

Russell A. Mittermeier
President, Conservation International

  • PhD in Biological Anthropology from Harvard
  • President of Conservation International (CI) (since 1989)
  • Chairman of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Species Survival Commission's Primate Specialist Group (since 1977)
  • Vice-president of IUCN (2009-2012)
  • Author of 20 books for both popular and scientific audiences, and more than 500 scientific and popular papers
  • Fieldwork on primates for over 40 years on three continents in mainly tropical locations, especially Brazil, Suriname and Madagascar

Djordjija Petkoski
Head of the Business, Competitiveness and Development team, World Bank Institute

  • MSc in Public Administration from Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, PhD in Economics from the University of Zagreb, and PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Belgrade
  • Head of the Business, Competitiveness and Development at the World Bank Institute (since 1992)
  • Author and co-author of 15 books and over 120 articles
  • Lecturer at leading universities and international organizations around the world

Antonio Vives
Principal Associate, Cumpetere

  • PhD in Corporate Finance, Carnegie Mellon University
  • Principal associate of Cumpetere, a consultancy firm in CSR and Sustainability
  • Consulting Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Stanford University
  • Officer of the Inter-American Development Bank, including Manager of the Sustainable Development Department (2005-07) and Vice-Chairman of the Investment Committee of its Pension Fund (1992-2007). Creator of the Inter-American Conferences on CSR
  • Professor at the graduate business schools of IESA in Venezuela, Carnegie Mellon, George Washington and Virginia Tech
  • Lecturer in more than 100 international conferences on CSR, infrastructure finance, financial markets development, business climate and micro and SME finance
  • Author of several books and dozens of articles on corporate and infrastructure finance and on CSR


Terms of reference


Objective
CEMEX wants to receive frank and informed opinions on the management of our sustainability issues, such as the quality of our Sustainable Development Report, Strategy, Performance and Accountability. We have invited a group of sustainability experts to sit on an independent panel providing counsel on these issues.

The Advisory Panel
Panel members represent the company's key stakeholder groups and the regions where we operate.

Members are asked to be on the panel for two years so that they will have time to gain a deeper understanding of CEMEX and be able to comment on our progress. The term may be extended if a panelist agrees to a request to continue.

Panelists offer views in their personal capacity. All discussions between the panelists and CEMEX senior executives are treated in confidence with the panel issuing an agreed joint statement annually for unedited publication in relation to the CEMEX Sustainable Development Report.

It is expected that the Panel will meet collectively with senior CEMEX executives either in person or by teleconference at least once a year. Panelists may be consulted independently on those topics where they have specialist knowledge.

CEMEX is interested in the opinions of the Panel and would prefer a consensus approach, but individual opinions are valuable and all panel members are encouraged to offer their own views where these diverge from the consensus.

CEMEX provides a facilitator to support the process and help the Panel organize meetings, form consensus and prepare minutes.

Continuous Improvement
In the spirit of improving the process, members may be consulted by a facilitator or CEMEX to give their views regarding the performance of the Panel.



Statements


View the panel's joint statements on our Sustainable Development Reports



Our responses


We are extremely pleased that the Sustainability Advisory Panel accepted the invitation to comment on our 2008 Sustainable Development Report (the Report). We are glad the panelists found the Report clear and comprehensive. The Panel raised specific issues which were posted online and further discussed in a follow-up conference call. Our response follows the structure of the Report, and conforms to the CEMEX sustainability framework. For each subject area we provide a summary of the Panel’s expections and our answer.

We are extremely grateful to the Panel for its comments. We are committed to being a leader in sustainability and believe that continuing an open and frank dialogue with the Panel is helping us reach our goal.

Download PDF version of the document

   Message from Chairman and CEO

› Economic impact

Expectation
A more comprehensive discussion on the impact of the global economic crisis on sustainability efforts, and about the impact of sustainability on the company’s financial performance.

Our response
The Panel’s point is noted. We would like to underline our Chairman and CEO’s comment that “Our commitment to sustainability remains solid despite the other issues we face”. The Report shows progress made to reduce impacts amid the current economic crisis, besides disclosing the annual financial investment to address environmental matters (page 40).

In our future reports we intend to better address the balance between financial and non-financial performance, including work to further interlink our annual financial and sustainable development reporting.


   Sustainability at CEMEX

› Sustainability management

Expectation
A better description of how sustainability topics are managed throughout the global organization, highlighting where responsibilities lie.

Our response
Our current sustainability governance structure - which includes the Sustainability Steering Committee and safety, health, environment and social councils - is described on page 10 of the Report.

The integration of sustainability into our business management systems and line management responsibilities is an ongoing process. We are determined to ensure that sustainability becomes embedded and we are taking steps to ensure this happens. This includes the consideration of incentives that link personal rewards with agreed performance metrics.

In our future reports we will consider adding more detail to the description of our sustainability management processes and our efforts to embed related practices. In particular, we will disclose the number of people with direct responsibility for health, safety, environment and social practices globally.


   Our people

› Safety

Expectation
More information on the efforts to improve safety among employees and contractors.

Our response
CEMEX shares the concern of the Panel over the number of accidents. Resources have been allocated to two key initiatives to improve our safety performance.

First, a leadership training course – to be rolled-out during the next two years - for line managers and those responsible for the safety of others was developed. This is designed to increase focus on the provision of a safe environment and risk controls.

Second, we are improving driving standards as most of our accidents are related to our large fleet of vehicles.  Improving road safety is a challenge faced by our industry. CEMEX is leading the World Business Council For Sustainable Development (WBCSD) Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) task force set up to develop industry-wide standards for the safe operation of vehicles. New standards are expected by the last quarter of 2009 and their implementation will be a priority for all companies.

In our future reports we anticipate improvement of our safety performance and continued disclosure of safety training progress.


   Our neighbors

› Housing

Expectation
Find ways to scale up low-income housing programs.

Our response
We are very proud of our Patrimonio Hoy program, which since its inception in 1998, has benefited over 224,000 families in four countries.  We continue to look for ways to maximize the benefits brought by this internationally-recognized program, especially during these harsh economic times. Moreover, we have developed other initiatives, such as the self-employment centers, through which we promote low-income housing self-construction.  We expect to report the continued growth of these programs in the countries where they have been established.

› Measuring social value

Expectation
Publish data on the impact of social contributions.

Our response
We agree on the importance of measuring the value of social projects. Our revised social investment guidelines include a number of key performance indicators to track results.  Furthermore, we intend to develop an internal rating system to measure the value of each initiative enabling us to rate their success. This will be in-house information that will help us focus on projects that contribute most to poverty reduction and local development.

   Our business partners

The Panel made no comments in relation to this section. We anticipate developing our reporting of this topic, linking it more closely to our financial reporting performance as well as our value chain impacts.

   Our world

› Biodiversity

Expectation
A clearer explanation on biodiversity performance and an outline of plans to protect biodiversity, including a discussion on protection of tropical forests as a cost-effective way to mitigate climate change.

Our response
We share the Panel’s concerns. Our work in this area is widely acknowledged by many in the international NGO community. Two years ago we signed a 10-year partnership with BirdLife International to map all quarries against key biodiversity areas, important bird areas, Natura 2000 areas and nationally-protected areas. This allowed us to identify sites that have a high potential to impact on ecosystems and areas of high biodiversity.

Our investment (resources and management time) will focus on high-risk areas, to ensure that during challenging economic times we maximize our impact. Hence, we are confident that areas that are most at risk will be adequately protected, and those sites without protection plans are in low-risk areas. Nevertheless, our commitment remains to have rehabilitation plans in place for all our active quarries by 2015. We will again examine the reporting of our efforts to protect biodiversity, to ensure that we are providing a fair picture of our work.

We agree that ecosystem-based mitigation and adaptation based on reforestation of forests will be a positive outcome of any global agreement to mitigate climate change and we favor the inclusion of grassland restoration in such an approach.

› Energy

Expectation
Provision of company-wide data on energy use, and acknowledgement of the embodied energy and lifecycle burdens of concrete.

Our response
Our cement-making accounts for 88.6% of our energy use. We concentrate our energy-saving in cement production because it is where we can make the most material impact. That is why our data are focused on this segment.

Energy used in cement manufacture also accounts for a large portion of our direct costs, which is one of the reasons we constantly seek ways to reduce it. We also seek to reduce the CO2 content of our products through:

  1. Improving energy efficiency in cement plants.
  2. Using alternative fuels and alternative raw materials.
  3. Investing in renewable power.

For instance, the use of alternative fuels, such as domestic waste, provides both cost and carbon benefits. In 2008, our use of alternative fuels reached 10.3% of our total energy consumption.

There are many benefits in using concrete in the construction of buildings and infrastructure. We have participated in the WBCSD’s Energy Efficiency in Buildings project. Its research showed that 40% of the world’s energy is consumed in buildings, 82% of which is used after construction. Building design and choice of materials affects the amount of energy a building uses.

As we move into a carbon-constrained world, we are convinced that the unique properties of concrete (thermal, reflective and durability) will produce enormous net benefits for the planet. In our future reports we will consider increasing the amount of information provided on energy use, without compromising our competitive position.

› Waste and recycling

Expectation
Normalized figures for waste generated and waste recycled.

Our response
Much of the by-product of cement manufacture is re-used. The rest of our operations produce comparatively little waste. However, the Panel’s query has prompted us to investigate the feasibility of measuring and reporting our total wastes.

Because concrete is such a widely used material, waste from demolition makes up a considerable portion of the world’s waste. When separated from the other building materials, concrete can be crushed and re-used as aggregates but this is costly, energy intensive and dependent on local building codes. The CSI studied opportunities to recycle concrete. The findings underline the many challenges, including cost and the fact that the cement and demolition industries are in different sectors.

We thank the panel for sharing their broad vision on waste and recycling. On future reports we will consider the range of metrics we publish from a materiality perspective, to enable our stakeholders to more easily compare our performance with others in our industry.

› Water

Expectation
More data on water use and conservation measures included in our management and reporting.

Our response
We are working to measure water consumption and plan to report these data in our future reports. In our current report, we already included the percentage of operations with water recycling systems.












CEMEX on Facebook CEMEX on Twitter CEMEX on YouTube CEMEX on Flickr
facebook.com/CEMEX twitter.com/CEMEX youtube.com/CEMEX flickr.com/CEMEX

Privacy Policy | Terms and conditions | Copyright © 2010 CEMEX S.A.B. de C.V. All rights reserved